Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Bulk HIE perforations


  • From: Joshua_Putnam <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Bulk HIE perforations
  • Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 19:36:10 -0800 (PST)

"Rolland Elliott" <rolland_elliott@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Lastly the other IR formats that Kodak provides for anyone's interest:
>Kodak's L-9 professional photographic catalog says Kodak sells the 
>following:
>CAT No.    Size mmxft   Spec. No.  Letter Code   Sales
>160 4149       35x150       417        HIE       1 Roll
>169 0841       70x150       494                  1 Roll
>The street prices for this film are a little cheaper.

Yes, I checked with Glazer's in Seattle, the 5" rolls that were
in past versions of L-9 are no longer listed in the current
edition.  Guess there wasn't even enough demand to keep them in
teh catalog as non-stocked options.

>According to KODAK, The 35mmx150ft film has Bell and Howell (BH) perforated 
>both edges while the 70mm roll has Type II performations - in accordance 
>with ANSI PH1.10-1976.  The 70mm film comes in a 4-mil Estar Base.

>Past users have reported that the 35mmx150' Bell & Howard performated film 
>has the same perforated edges as standard 35mm film. Why Kodak makes it 
>sound like it won't work in regular cameras is a mystery to me.

I can perhaps clarify that a bit, having gone through several of
the 150 foot rolls.  B&H perforations have a very slightly
different shape than Kodak standard perforations.  If you lay
one on top of the other you can see the difference, but I've
never had a 35mm camera that failed to take the bulk HIE, feed
it properly, count frames correctly, etc.  The perforations are
in the right place, and almost identical -- there's probably
more difference between Kodak standard perforations and other
brands of standard 35mm film.  I suspect this might be a problem
in the other direction -- the more precise registration of film
in a movie camera might not accept standard 35mm still film
perforation.  But the bulk stuff does work fine in my Olympus,
Minolta, and Pentax cameras.


As for the earlier comments on the dating of 70mm, I have a roll
waiting for me at Glazer's, and I'll let you know what it says.
But I've used HIE that was past-dated when I bought it, and as
long as it was cold stored the whole time it should be fine
anyway.  I'm currently using bulk HIE that expired two years
ago.  It had expired when I bought it, but had spent its entire
life in a refrigerator, and I've kept it frozen since then; it
gives exposures identical to factory-fresh HIE.

-- 
 Josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx  is  Joshua Putnam / P.O. Box 13220 / Burton, WA 98013
                       "My other bike is a car."                   
                     http://www.wolfenet.com/~josh/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************